xamdam comments on Some Thoughts Are Too Dangerous For Brains to Think - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (311)
I think this is a worthwhile discussion.
Here are some "true things" I don't want to know about:
I'm surprised about the last one. I think it would be quite helpful if you could be prepared for that.
The other two are experiences you wouldn't like to have. If you had the indexical knowledge of what the catchiest jingle was, you could better avoid hearing it.
That's a big if ;)
I am not.
I have to admit there's information I shield myself from as well.
I don't like watching real people die on video. I worry about getting desensitized/dehumanized.
I don't want to see 2g1c either. (by extension, most of the grungier parts of the intertubes.)
I don't want to know (from experience) what heroin feels like.
I do know people who believe in total desensitization -- they think that the reflex to shudder or gag is something you have to burn out of yourself. I don't think I want that for myself, though.
You know, those shock videos are not as bad as they look. 2g1c is usually thought to be something in the line of chocolate; and the infamous Tubgirl is known to be just orange juice.
(Which makes sense; eating feces is a good way to get sick.)
-- Shel Silverstein
It's not obvious that knowing more always makes us better off — because the landscape of rationality is not smooth.
The quote in Eliezer's site stating that "That which can be destroyed by the truth should be." sounded to me too strong a claim from the very first time I read it. Many people cultivate falsehoods or use blinkers that are absolutely necessary to the preservation of their sanity (sic), and removing them could terribly jeopardize their adaptability to the environment. It could literally kill them.