= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
Vladimir_Nesov comments on The Instrumental Value of Your Own Time - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (45)
This article doesn't seem to have a point.
Conceded. It's a series of questions, each preceded by enough context to explain why the questions might be interesting. There is no thesis, except that current analytical tools for measuring the value of time may be less satisfactory than expected.
A summary of the arguments (tl;dr version) would be nice too. I appreciate that you put the questions this leads up to at the top, but a tl;dr summary would be even better.
I beg your pardon, Silas. :-) I'd most likely be happy to put it up, but I don't know what a tl;dr is.
'too long; didn't read'.
In other words, an abstract or summary. For people who not only can't be bothered to read the article, but can't be bothered to write 'summary' either.
Don't know if you're joking, but that's an abbreviation for "too long; didn't read", and even so, not knowing that shouldn't keep you from putting a summary with the specifications I described. If you have one to put up, go for it.
Nope, wasn't joking. I'm that unhip. Anyway, I'll work on an executive summary.
EDIT: tl;dr is up.