cupholder comments on (One reason) why capitalism is much maligned - Less Wrong

1 Post author: multifoliaterose 19 July 2010 03:48AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (94)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: multifoliaterose 19 July 2010 03:09:20PM 2 points [-]

If the world had, to date, persisted under a poor political / economic system with only a few similarities to the ideal one, you would be able to say the same thing.

It's reasonable to imagine that there was some sort of "natural selection" of economic systems and that the one that emerged is relatively close to ideal.

The anthropic principle is relevant here.

And yes I read the rest of the article, and I don't think it recovered from this error.

I'm open to suggestions for how I might improve the introduction to the article to make the article more palatable.

Comment author: cupholder 20 July 2010 04:33:37AM *  0 points [-]

I'm open to suggestions for how I might improve the introduction to the article to make the article more palatable.

I was going to suggest this, but I see you've already added it: thanks for editing in your definition of capitalism at the top of the post. When I first read the post, that was something I thought would improve it. Like SilasBarta I thought it was a bad idea to leave unclear what you were counting as capitalism.