WrongBot comments on Against the standard narrative of human sexual evolution - Less Wrong

7 Post author: WrongBot 23 July 2010 05:28AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (153)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: cousin_it 23 July 2010 01:14:27PM *  9 points [-]

female sexual exclusivity is necessary for males to determine paternity, but if all resources are equally shared, then there is little point in knowing paternity

This sounds weird. Your genes don't want you to know you're the father, they want you to be the father, and female sexual exclusivity helps with that.

Comment author: WrongBot 23 July 2010 02:33:56PM 0 points [-]

Yes, but sperm competition is an easier departure from small, reciprocally altruistic forager bands. Pre-agriculture, defecting in that particular Prisoner's Dilemma led to either death or a much narrower selection of mates. Getting rid of the strict enforcement of resource sharing (by adopting agriculture) is the discontinuity that makes this counter-intuitive.

Comment author: [deleted] 23 July 2010 04:25:14PM 0 points [-]

Ah I've see you've thought of the effect of agriculture, I should have read all the comments before posting.

Comment author: WrongBot 23 July 2010 04:49:30PM 0 points [-]

Your point was a good one. The societal changes wrought by agriculture cannot be emphasized heavily enough.