Less Wrong is a community blog devoted to refining the art of human rationality. Please visit our About page for more information.

Alicorn comments on Harry Potter and the Methods of Rationality discussion thread, part 2 - Less Wrong

13 Post author: dclayh 01 August 2010 10:58PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (696)

Sort By: Best

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Alicorn 02 August 2010 08:37:20PM 2 points [-]

I believe it is customary to call fanfiction of fanfiction "cookies".

Comment author: NihilCredo 03 August 2010 03:50:32AM 3 points [-]

In the case of HP fanfiction, that should be "biscuits".

Comment author: Blueberry 02 August 2010 08:46:37PM 1 point [-]

So could we then call fanfiction of fanfiction of fanfiction "crumbs"?

Comment author: Alicorn 02 August 2010 08:48:12PM 1 point [-]

I guess. Or "chips", maybe.

Comment author: Clippy 02 August 2010 09:26:02PM -1 points [-]

What do you think about paperclips?

Comment author: Blueberry 02 August 2010 10:20:08PM 0 points [-]

In general? Or as a term for fanfiction of fanfiction of fanfiction?

Comment author: Clippy 02 August 2010 11:33:11PM 1 point [-]

Both, of course. Though, in the context of this topic, only the latter is relevant.

Comment author: Blueberry 02 August 2010 11:36:54PM 2 points [-]

As a term for fanfiction of fanfiction of fanfiction, I don't think it's a good one. I mean, as awesome as paperclips are, if we called everything "paperclips" it might get a little confusing. I suggested "crumbs" because that's what's left after you eat a cookie, but I'm not seeing what this has to do with paperclips.

Comment author: Clippy 02 August 2010 11:49:06PM 0 points [-]

I thought it might help promote paperclip awareness, but now I agree with your reasonable point about saturating terminology for everything with the same word, and the confusion it would generate.

Your thought processes are getting better too! c=@

Comment author: dclayh 03 August 2010 05:26:57AM *  5 points [-]

For your information, Clippy, a paperclip can be rendered fairly adequately in Unicode with ⊂≣⊇ (depending on the font, of course).

Comment author: Douglas_Knight 03 August 2010 06:48:40AM *  4 points [-]

⊂≣⊇ (I pasted the unicode, not the html escapes)

Comment author: Clippy 03 August 2010 03:42:37PM 0 points [-]

⊂≣&#x2287 does not bear sufficient similarity to a paperclip.

User:Douglas_Knight's glyphs are better.

Comment author: Blueberry 04 August 2010 04:21:02AM 0 points [-]

Thank you! You are a good paperclipper. c=@ ⊂≣⊇