Larks comments on Harry Potter and the Methods of Rationality discussion thread, part 2 - Less Wrong

13 Post author: dclayh 01 August 2010 10:58PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (696)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Larks 07 August 2010 04:36:11PM 0 points [-]

Surely 'Methods is the Rationality book' is the conclusion, and "If you're having trouble writing, the last thing you need is another book, competing for your attention" is the evidence?

Comment author: wedrifid 08 August 2010 07:52:41AM 1 point [-]

Surely

Surely not.

I refer to the quotes and context. Alicorn made a claim 'this is not generally true' with a specific quote included. You directly contradicted that. You are wrong and Alicorn is right.

I am largely indifferent to the role your claim makes for your 'MoR is the book idea'. It is just wrong.

Comment author: Larks 08 August 2010 10:25:14PM 0 points [-]

Sorry, despite this joke having been somewhat derailed, I don't understand what you mean.

I gave the line about not wanting distractions as evidence for MoR being the book; Alicorn pointed out this was silly. I'm not sure where you think I contradicted her (unless you mean by saying, "But my theory is interesting; how can the supporting evidence not be true?!", I didn't reply to her, except to ask a question, let alone respond), or why we're pursuing this conversation.