Without exhaustive knowledge of canon, there's no way to know whether a given detail is specified at all or not.
That's a good point. We can only hope that mistakes will be obscure.
Eliezer may not have realized that Harry and Draco's experimental results should have been outright confusing given the canon-available information on inheritance.
But that's just DidNotDoTheResearch. One obvious source of information begins (and has begun for some time) with the most relevant quotation.
Scabbers!Pettigrew requires one person to have done something ridiculously stupid, all on his own.
Sadly, that is very credible in the world that I know. (The first mistake is driven by panic; then he sticks with it out of intellectual inertia, sunk cost fallacy, etc.) However, it violates the rule that Harry's enemies must also be more rational than in canon. But then Eliezer still keeps some characters (Hermione, for example) canon!stupid.
The point is not that Eliezer chose wrong but that it's unpredictable.
But then Eliezer still keeps some characters (Hermione, for example) canon!stupid.
Really? My impression is that Hermione has been changed in roughly the same manner as all the other characters (more clever, arrogant and ego-driven). Canon!Hermione couldn't remotely have pulled off the last half dozen MoR chapters, for example.
ETA: There is now a third thread, so send new comments there.
Since the first thread has exceeded 500 comments, it seems time for a new one, with Eliezer's just-posted Chapter 33 & 34 to kick things off.
From previous post: