= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
gwern comments on Harry Potter and the Methods of Rationality discussion thread, part 2 - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (696)
Can they do that? If I were a student in a class, I have about as much authority to stop a fellow student from taking a test as I do to command the tide to retreat.
Armies are scary. When do humans die in such numbers and such horrifying ways as when armies come visiting?
Entertainment, information, possible reactions.
Sure they can. As a last resort, they could execute traitors from the last battle at the beginning of the next one.
So? Quirrell is talking about how to organize resistance to the next Dark Lord. Duh, obviously it should be organized as an army. Harry's protests about fascists and such are stupid, instead he should be proposing smart things that modern Muggle armies do. And Quirrell even calls his teams "armies"! What?
This is both a significant cost to the general and a motivation for traitors to continue defecting and recruit further traitors. As a general I would allow for the loss of two soldiers to friendly fire (-2 points, 2 less combatants) for each traitor (that doesn't submit willingly to execution). The victims do get to defend themselves. In addition the 'execution' civil-unrest at the start of the battle could constitute a non-trivial distraction in the battle.
It makes a difference that the soldiers have little to lose but pride but the generals quite a lot more.