Annoyance comments on Schools Proliferating Without Evidence - Less Wrong

40 Post author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 15 March 2009 06:43AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (57)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Annoyance 16 March 2009 01:37:05AM -2 points [-]

"Philosophers are more susceptible to this failure mode because on many important philosophical questions, a standard if not unanimous approach is argue that the question cannot be answered by evidence."

No, philosophers are more susceptible because most of them can't recognize that "cannot be answered by evidence" means an answer can't be obtained at all.

To such individuals, reason is merely a passing fad coequal with every other way of asserting something, a fleeting hiccup that they're far too fashionable to consider important.

Comment author: Matt_Simpson 16 March 2009 04:05:05AM -1 points [-]

No, philosophers are more susceptible because most of them can't recognize that "cannot be answered by evidence" means an answer can't be obtained at all.

I would say both. Some things that philosophers think can't be answered by evidence are in fact answered by evidence, such as whether 2 + 2 = 4.