ciphergoth comments on The Threat of Cryonics - Less Wrong

36 Post author: lsparrish 03 August 2010 07:57PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (212)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: ciphergoth 05 August 2010 06:53:40AM 5 points [-]

What's the big difference with cryonics - is it the time you spend frozen? How long would you have to spend frozen before you prefer death? Clearly eight hours would be OK with you, since I assume you sometimes sleep that long - so is there a cutoff period after which you would rather die than be revived?

Comment author: TobyBartels 05 August 2010 01:34:40PM 2 points [-]

is there a cutoff period after which you would rather die than be revived?

Somewhere between a few years and a few decades, I think.

Comment author: NihilCredo 06 August 2010 12:29:58AM 3 points [-]

(IANAL) I think that would be a very simple clause to include in any freezing arrangement.

Comment author: TobyBartels 06 August 2010 01:09:46AM 0 points [-]

is there a cutoff period after which you would rather die than be revived?

Somewhere between a few years and a few decades, I think.

(IANAL) I think that would be a very simple clause to include in any freezing arrangement.

The extremely small chance that cryonics will work within that time doesn't justify the expense.

But for those who can afford more, it would be interesting to see short-term cryonics added to a health insurance plan.