Kingreaper comments on The Threat of Cryonics - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (212)
That line of reasoning is incorrect, I believe. I can imagine seeing someone I love treated that way: that would be distinctly worse than knowing they died painlessly and were treated with respect.
The reason is that among my preferences is the wish that my family, friends etc. be treated at least respectfully by others. If this kind of fate is visited upon them, my preferences are being thwarted, which causes me to suffer.
I also wish to continue caring for my family, so from my perspective my own death isn't "something you can't care about because you are dead", it's a big disruption of my plans. That is unchanged by the fact that after my death I will be unable to feel anything about that disruption.
So, concern for what happens to my body in and after death is actually quite legitimate, and in fact is an extension of the legitimate wish to live.
Well, unless those final wishes are to be stored in LN2 in Detroit. That seems to contradict your thesis, appealing as it looks at first glance.
The whole point of cryonics is to ensure it's NOT your final wish.
A paradox!
It's their final wish if and only if we do not comply with it. But we should comply with it if and only if it's not their final wish. (The latter ‘only if’ requires some external reason, such as waste of money; of course we assume that the relatives who make this decision don't believe in the promise of cryonics.) Therefore, whatever we do will be immoral, one way or another.