Jackercrack comments on The Least Convenient Possible World - Less Wrong

165 Post author: Yvain 14 March 2009 02:11AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (186)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: [deleted] 17 October 2014 04:45:11AM 0 points [-]

I think we can only have a moral code that works on most worlds at best

That doesn't follow from your logic. There could be multiple functions of maximal expectd utility. Or more fundamentally, how you sum over possible words reflects your prior anthropic biases (which worlds you think are most likely), which is sadly a completely arbitrary choice.

Comment author: Jackercrack 17 October 2014 09:55:07AM *  0 points [-]

I took "all possible worlds that contain me" to mean all worlds where history went the same until my birth. Any world where significant things went differently would have led a different sperm to create a different person than him. That is, they should be reasonably similar but can still include diverse outcomes from for example nuclear war where Pr0methean is living in post-apocalyptic fallout to a USSR-US alliance leading to a fascist authoritarian government in your country to choice.

I did in fact assume that worlds more similar to our current one would make up the majority [or at least the plurality] in that case. Was I wrong to assume that?

Edit: thinking about it now, the plurality was post-hoc rationalisation, so ignore it. On a side note, how do I do strikethrough text?

Comment author: [deleted] 17 October 2014 08:09:39PM 0 points [-]

Retract -- circle with an line through it.

Comment author: Jackercrack 17 October 2014 08:42:21PM 0 points [-]

What do you mean by circle with a line through it? Is that some sort of code for what buttons to press?

Comment author: Nornagest 17 October 2014 08:45:37PM *  2 points [-]

There should be a button with that appearance in the lower right-hand corner of your comments, which brings up a tooltip labeled "retract" when you mouse over it. Using it will strikethrough the entire text of your post, which 'round these parts is shorthand for "I, the author, no longer endorse this comment". Using it for a second time will delete your post, unless there are responses to it.

There isn't any way to strikethrough portions of a post with LW's markup. Or at least I wasn't able to find one the last time I looked into this. The usual Markdown syntax is disabled here, probably to reserve the look for the retract option.

Comment author: wedrifid 13 November 2014 08:01:53AM *  3 points [-]

The usual Markdown syntax is disabled here, probably to reserve the look for the retract option.

The causality is unlikely. There was never strikethrough syntax here and the retract option was not conceived until years after the creation of the forum (and syntax choices).

Comment author: Jackercrack 17 October 2014 08:54:28PM 1 point [-]

Ah, thank you. I hadn't noticed that