JoshuaZ comments on Extraterrestrial paperclip maximizers - Less Wrong

3 Post author: multifoliaterose 08 August 2010 08:35PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (157)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Clippy 08 August 2010 10:28:59PM *  19 points [-]

For a whimsical example, if humans built a (literal) staple maximizer, this would pose a very serious threat to a (literal) paperclip maximizer.

But why would humans ever want to build a staple maximizer? Let's not forget, staples:

  • are single-use, while paperclips are infinite-use if used properly.
  • are difficult to remove, while papercilps are easy to remove.
  • permanently puncture the paper, while paperclips leave, at most, some mild curvature.
  • require an applicator that can easily jam, while paperclips can be applied by hand.
  • cannot be used for alternate purpose in an emergency, while paperclips can be repurposed into projectile weapons, lockpicks, conducting wire, hook fasteners, and much more (not that I recommend using it for these).
Comment author: JoshuaZ 09 August 2010 03:32:33AM 3 points [-]

cannot be used for alternate purpose in an emergency, while paperclips can be repurposed into projectile weapons, lockpicks, conducting wire, hook fasteners, and much more (not that I recommend using it for these).

I would think that a paperclip maximizer wouldn't want people to know about these since they can easily lead to the destruction of paperclips.

Comment author: Oscar_Cunningham 09 August 2010 06:54:56AM 7 points [-]

But they also increase demand for paperclips.