NancyLebovitz comments on A Proof of Occam's Razor - Less Wrong

3 Post author: Unknowns 10 August 2010 02:20PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (121)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: cousin_it 11 August 2010 10:59:02PM *  19 points [-]

Not all LW participants need to know advanced math. Human rationality is a broad topic, and someone like Yvain or Alicorn can contribute a lot without engaging the math side of things. What I care about is the signal-to-noise ratio in math discussion threads. In other words, I'm okay with regular ignorance but hate vocal ignorance with a fiery passion.

I propose a simple heuristic: if you see others using unfamiliar math, look it up before commenting. If it relies on other concepts that you don't understand, look them up too, and so on. Yes, it might take you days of frantic digging. It sometimes takes me days full-time, even though I have a math degree. Time spent learning more math is always better invested than time spent in novice-level discussions.

Comment author: NancyLebovitz 12 August 2010 09:18:59AM 2 points [-]

Cousin_it and JoshuaZ, this sounds as though it could be a good topic (or group of topics) for a top-level post.

Comment author: JoshuaZ 12 August 2010 08:54:44PM 2 points [-]

Do you mean a set of posts on telling when you don't know enough or a set of posts on the math people should know?

Comment author: NancyLebovitz 12 August 2010 10:28:10PM 2 points [-]

Either or both would be useful, but I was thinking about the latter.