= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
Morendil comments on Welcome to Less Wrong! (2010-2011) - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (796)
Maybe especially so if they consist only of the interjection "WTF".
I'd hazard that a request for a downvote explanation has a better chance of being answered satisfactorily if it is framed nicely, and perhaps an even better chance if you first think about why the comment might have been downvoted in the first place and offer a hypothesis.
And I'd strongly recommend not downvoting anyone who answers a request for a downvote explanation. Think about how that comes across.
That was an edit to an existing comment about something else.
The grandparent of that comment contained a parenthetical, polite discussion of a previous downvote. A sense of beleaguerment should have been understandable in that context.
EDIT: That edit has now been removed. Anyone still think -2 is an appropriate score for that comment?