This post has too many comments to show them all at once! Newcomers, please proceed in an orderly fashion to the newest welcome thread.
upvoted, because I've been wondering how the QM sequence is looked upon by physicists :)
I'd be interested to know that myself.
I've only spoken with a few because it's a potentially awkward subject. I recall one other strongly and one other regular-strength in favor of MW+decoherence (both in my rough age-group);
one classmate said "decoherence, as I understand it, is a little more reasonable sounding than most", for ontology, but uses the Copenhagen interpretation when thinking about epistemology;
one professor was against MW just on uneasiness grounds, but didn't have a firm opinion;
one professor with the philosophy "If it's jus...