Will_Newsome comments on Is it rational to be religious? Simulations are required for answer. - Less Wrong

-13 Post author: Aleksei_Riikonen 11 August 2010 03:20PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (71)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: jimrandomh 11 August 2010 06:11:08PM 1 point [-]

In the year 2020, cousin_it downloads some software for running predictor sims. He wants to optimize his future conduct -test which particular minor mind-hack would be the most beneficial, given his individual psychological makeup. So he runs many ancestor sims of himself poisoned with different irrational mind-hacks to see who wins in the past. I am one such sim, poisoned in an unknown manner; what should I do?

I have precommitted as strongly as I can to never run simulations of myself which are worse off than the version the simulation was based on. This might fall out as a consequence of UDT, but with a time-varying utility function I'm not really sure.

In general, self-copying and self-simulation require extreme care. They might be able to affect subjective experience in a way that goes back in time. The rules of subjective experience, if any, are non-transferrable (you can't learn them from someone else who's figured them out, even in principle) and might not be discoverable at all.

Comment author: Will_Newsome 12 August 2010 01:16:14AM 5 points [-]

Humans can't easily precommit to anything at all, and even if they could, it'd be incredibly stupid to try without thinking about it for a very very long time. I'm surprised at how many people don't immediately see this.