XiXiDu comments on Should I believe what the SIAI claims? - Less Wrong

23 Post author: XiXiDu 12 August 2010 02:33PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (600)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: XiXiDu 12 August 2010 05:51:36PM -1 points [-]

I haven't done the reading. For further explanation read this comment.

Why do you always and exclusively mention Charles Stross? I need to know if you actually read all of my post.

Comment author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 12 August 2010 09:00:03PM -1 points [-]

Because the fact that you're mentioning Charles Stross means that you need to do basic reading, not complicated reading.

Comment author: Rain 13 August 2010 12:36:32PM 6 points [-]

To put my own spin on XiXiDu's questions: What quality or position does Charles Stross possess that should cause us to leave him out of this conversation (other than the quality 'Eliezer doesn't think he should be mentioned')?

Comment author: XiXiDu 13 August 2010 08:12:08AM 1 point [-]

Another vacuous statement. I expected more.