Emile comments on Should I believe what the SIAI claims? - Less Wrong

23 Post author: XiXiDu 12 August 2010 02:33PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Article Navigation

Comments (600)

Comments (600)

Sort By: Best

Show:

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Emile 23 August 2010 09:03:46AM 3 points [-]

I haven't followed the ins and the outs of this pointless drama, but I had assumed those were things Eliezer actually said. I'm pretty miffed to learn that those weren't actually quotes, but rather something you had "inferred from revealed self-evident wisdom".

That kind of stuff makes it tempting to pretty much ignore anything you write.

Comment deleted 23 August 2010 12:05:42PM * [+] (5 children)

Comment author: Emile 23 August 2010 12:39:08PM * 3 points [-]

I listened to the video. He said that while reading aloud a question someone was asking him.

I'm not objecting to the reformulation in your now modified post. I'm just pissed that you made me believe that it was an actual Eliezer Yudkowsky quote.

Comment author: XiXiDu 23 August 2010 01:11:41PM * 0 points [-]

He said that while reading aloud a question someone was asking him.

Look, I didn't know that everything within these "" symbols is taken to be the verbatim quotation of someone. I use them all the time to highlight or mark whatever I see fit. And the answers I wrote to the questions he has been asked resemble the gist of what he said. I simply didn't expect anyone to believe that I transcribed two +4 minute videos which I linked to right after. I also never made anyone believe anything controversial. It is something that I think is widely accepted within this community anyway and it is what he said in the videos, although more long-winded.

Comment author: Airedale 23 August 2010 02:45:45PM 6 points [-]

Look, I didn't know that everything within these "" symbols is taken to be the verbatim quotation of someone. I use them all the time to highlight or mark whatever I see fit.

The "blog" of "unnecessary" quotation marks

But on a more "serious" note, when the implication is that you're "quoting" someone, and you're "using" quotation marks, "readers" will generally interpret the marks as quoting rather than "highlighting."

Comment author: XiXiDu 23 August 2010 04:06:26PM * 8 points [-]

Look, I'm quite often an idiot. I was looking for excuses while being psychologically overwhelmed today. If people here perceived that I did something wrong there, I probably did. I was just being lazy and imprudent so I wrote what I thought was the answer given by EY to the question posed in that part of a Q&A video series. There was no fraudulent intent on my part.

So please accept my apologies for possible misguidance and impoliteness. I'm just going to delete the comment now. (ETA: I'll just leave the links to the videos.)

I'm trying for some time now to not getting involved on here anymore and to get back to being a passive reader. But replies make me feel constrained to answer once more.

If there is something else, let me know and I'll just delete it.

Comment author: WrongBot 23 August 2010 05:17:25PM 2 points [-]

Upvoted for admission of error.

Emile comments on Should I believe what the SIAI claims? - Less Wrong

Article Navigation

Comments (600)

Nearest Meetups

Virtual Study Room

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

Recent Rationality Quotes

Recent Wiki Edits

Top Contributors, 30 Days

Recent Karma Awards

Comments (600)

Top Contributors, 30 Days

You'll need to login or register to do that

(Don't worry, it only takes a few seconds)

Create

Login