JoshuaZ comments on Taking Ideas Seriously - Less Wrong

51 Post author: Will_Newsome 13 August 2010 04:50PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (257)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: JoshuaZ 13 August 2010 09:00:42PM *  3 points [-]

In the societal level, it leads to a world where almost no attention is paid to existential risks like EMP attacks.

How is an EMP attack an existential risk? EMPs, even large ones, are largely limited by line-of-sight. You can't EMP more than a continent in the most extreme circumstance. Large scale methods of making EMPs are either nukes or flux compression generators. The first provides more direct risk from targeting population centers. The second has a really cool name but isn't very practical and can't produce EMPs as large as a nuke. What am I missing?

Comment author: Will_Newsome 13 August 2010 10:12:16PM *  2 points [-]

I was thinking nuclear EMPs which are very dangerous, but you're right to say they aren't of themselves existential risks; merely catastrophic ones.

Edited post to reflect your criticism.