JGWeissman comments on Newcomb's Problem: A problem for Causal Decision Theories - Less Wrong

8 [deleted] 16 August 2010 11:25AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (120)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: bentarm 17 August 2010 05:32:07PM *  4 points [-]

An issue that often occurs to me when discussing these questions. I one-box, cooperate in one-shot PD's, and pay the guy who gave me a lift out of the desert. I've no idea what decision theory I'm using when I decide to do these things, but I still know that that I'd do them. I'm pretty sure that's what most other people would do as well.

Does anyone actually know how Human Decision Theory works? I know there are examples of problems where HDT fails miserably and CDT comes out better, but is there a coherent explanation for how HDT manages to get all of these problems right? Has anyone attempted to develop a decision theory which successfully solves these sorts of problems by mimicking the way in which people successfully solve them?

Comment author: JGWeissman 17 August 2010 06:32:06PM 1 point [-]

is there a coherent explanation for how HDT manages to get all of these problems right?

Unilateraly cooperating in one-shot true PD's is not right. If the other player's decision is not correlated with yours, you should defect.