rwallace comments on Desirable Dispositions and Rational Actions - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (180)
There are a few essential questions here:
I'm not convinced that the answer to any of these is "yes", and I don't think you've really argued for them. This post would be stronger and more interesting if you attempted to make the point that agents with irrational dispositions do tend to be rewarded, and tend to be rewarded enough that being irrational is worth it.
(As for #3, I think there was an Eliezer post on that or a related issue, not sure what it was called...)
Edit: I think I was thinking of Doublethink (Choosing to be Biased).
By "irrational", do you mean in the sense of "would pay the $100 as Parfit's Hitchhiker"? If so, then the answer to all three questions is yes: there are lots of scenarios in real life where we are called upon to pay debts both positive and negative (repay favors, retaliate against aggression) and we think the benefit to be gained from doing so will be less than the cost. There are enough such scenarios that a disposition to pay debts without stopping to do utility calculations usually pays off handsomely over a lifetime.