= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
FAWS comments on Desirable Dispositions and Rational Actions - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (180)
Because, in predicting my future decisions, he is performing Laplace demon computations based on Heisenberg demon measurements. And physics rules out such demons.
Anything which cannot consistently coexist with what is already known to exist
One possibility: Omega is running this universe as a simulation, and has already run a large number of earlier identical instances.
There may be many less obvious possibilities, even if you require Omega to be certain rather than just very sure.
Ok, that is possible, I suppose. Though it does conflict, in a sense, with the claim that he put the money in the box before I made the decision whether to one-box or two-box. Because, in some sense, I already made that decision in all(?) of those earlier identical simulations.