PaulAlmond comments on Should humanity give birth to a galactic civilization? - Less Wrong

-6 [deleted] 17 August 2010 01:07PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (85)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: PaulAlmond 17 August 2010 02:27:43PM 4 points [-]

Is anyone going to propose this as an answer to (what some say is) the Fermi paradox?

Comment author: [deleted] 17 August 2010 02:42:04PM *  3 points [-]

I thought people would be too bored of it to mention. I've heard it proposed dozens of times as a possible explanation. I should probably spend less time with philosophy majors.

Anyway the strong version of the statement is much more interesting. Not only do naturally evolved intelligences all have values that for some reason or another choose to rather let it all end than endure existence, it also means that they never spawn AI's with values sufficiently radical to disagree. The mind space that encompasses is mind boggling.

Either its hard for a civ to build a AI with truly alien values, they go extinct before they can build AIs (different argument), decide to kill themselves before doing so (odd) or nearly all possible minds agree nonexistance is good.

We may have very very weird minds if the last option is the answer.