= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
cousin_it comments on What a reduction of "probability" probably looks like - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (29)
I'd imagined these terms would be self-explanatory from the post :-) The numbers refer to variants of the Born rule where the exponent doesn't necessarily equal 2. For example, see page 6 of this paper by Aaronson.
I figured out what the n-world referred to because of familiarity with the problem, but it would probably still help to specifically define it, since it doesn't take much effort but would save readers a lot of time.
Ah thanks. I should've been able to figure that out from your third thought experiment anyways.