Perplexed comments on Transparency and Accountability - Less Wrong

16 Post author: multifoliaterose 21 August 2010 01:01PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (141)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Perplexed 22 August 2010 04:12:40AM 0 points [-]

This is rapidly becoming surreal.

Forbidden is not a fundamental property of the world, it is imposed by theorists with agendas.

Samuelson, Wald, von Neumann, Savage, and the other founders of "revealed preference" forbid us to ask how much Joe (or anything else) is worth, independent of an agent with preferences, such as Mary.

Emmanuel Kant, and anyone else who takes "The categorical imperative" at all seriously, forbids us to ask what Joe is worth to Mary, though we may ask what Joe's cat Maru is worth to Mary.

I knew I shouldn't have gotten involved in this thread.

Comment author: timtyler 22 August 2010 07:00:05AM 4 points [-]

Immanuel Kant says we that can't ask what Joe is worth to Mary?

So what? Why should anyone heed that advice? It is silly.