The question shouldn't be, Would she do it? The question should be, is that actually the most pain she can put her characters in?

Reminds me of something Lois Bujold once said:

A fan once took me aback by assuming that, because I gave my characters so many political problems to wrestle with, I must be wildly interested in politics.

Actually, I hate politics, especially contemporary -- although this year I expect I have a lot of company. What's really going on here, I have decided, thinking about this misperception, is an application of my worst-possible-thing guideline -- you know, my now-too-often-quoted stick for stirring up plots that goes, think of the worst possible thing you can do to this character, and then do it. Note the emphasis on the this, because it changes with each character. To my tastes, the worst possible thing I could do to any character is to force them to deal with politics.

This may also serve to partially answer Vaniver's very perceptive complaints as well.

I suspect that far more painful would be to later eha vagb Rqjneq nyvir, cnve-obaqrq jvgu fbzrbar ryfr, jbexvat sbe gur rarzl, naq (yrtvgvzngryl) shevbhf ng Oryyn sbe univat frg vagb zbgvba gur Phyyraf' qrfgehpgvba. Rfcrpvnyyl vs lbh pbhyq neenatr vg fb gung Oryyn unq gb pubbfr orgjrra xvyyvat Rqjneq naq yrggvat Ryfcrgu qvr.