= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
b1shop comments on Self-fulfilling correlations - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (47)
I really like this post. I'd like to see a sequence of ways statistical analysis can go wrong. This article and the inverted-J one both fit that description well.
Are there any other posts on the subject?
I think a theme of LessWrong is that statistical analysis goes wrong by default, and it requires work to keep it right.