Vladimir_Nesov comments on Harry Potter and the Methods of Rationality discussion thread, part 3 - Less Wrong

5 Post author: Unnamed 30 August 2010 05:37AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (560)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Vladimir_Nesov 18 September 2010 04:42:39PM *  0 points [-]

Killed the dementor the same way he did, except making claims based off a sane model of reality.

Which incorrect claim, specifically, is an example of what you talk about? Death will lose more or less inevitably, under the condition that civilization survives (and death has no say in whether it does).

Comment author: wedrifid 18 September 2010 06:35:32PM 2 points [-]

Which incorrect claim, specifically, is an example of what you talk about?

p(death is defeated). Not p(death is defeated | civilization survives).

Death will lose more or less inevitably, under the condition that civilization survives (and death has no say in whether it does).

Yes, more or less. The most obvious cases where it wouldn't are

  • If one of Robin's speculated Malthusian futures came to pass. Or
  • If someone goes and creates a dystopian singularity. (For example, if a well intentioned AI researcher implements CEV<Humanity>, gives humanity what it wishes for and it turns out that humans are coherently extrapolatably as silly as Dumbledore.)