Eliezer has been accused of delusions of grandeur for his belief in his own importance. But if Eliezer is guilty of such delusions then so am I and, I suspect, are many of you.
Consider two beliefs:
The next millennium will be the most critical in mankind’s existence because in most of the Everett branches arising out of today mankind will go extinct or start spreading through the stars.
Eliezer’s work on friendly AI makes him the most significant determinant of our fate in (1).
Let 10^N represent the average across our future Everett branches of the total number of sentient beings whose ancestors arose on earth. If Eliezer holds beliefs (1) and (2) then he considers himself the most important of these beings and the probability of this happening by chance is 1 in 10^N. But if (1) holds then the rest of us are extremely important as well through how our voting, buying, contributing, writing… influences mankind’s fate. Let say that makes most of us one of the trillion most important beings who will ever exist. The probability of this happening by chance is 1 in 10^(N-12).
If N is at least 18 it’s hard to think of a rational criteria under which believing you are 1 in 10^N is delusional whereas thinking you are 1 in 10^(N-12) is not.
It's not about the numbers, and it's not about Eliezer in particular. Think of it this way:
Clearly, the development of interstellar travel (if we successfully accomplish this) will be one of the most important events in the history of the universe.
If I believe our civilization has a chance of achieving this, then in a sense that makes me, as a member of said civilization, important. This is a rational conclusion.
If I believe I'm going to build a starship in my garage, that makes me delusional. The problem isn't the odds against me being the one person who...
This thread is for the discussion of Less Wrong topics that have not appeared in recent posts. If a discussion gets unwieldy, celebrate by turning it into a top-level post.