Kaj_Sotala comments on Less Wrong: Open Thread, September 2010 - Less Wrong

3 Post author: matt 01 September 2010 01:40AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (610)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: Kaj_Sotala 01 September 2010 04:46:23PM 15 points [-]

Neuroskeptic's Help, I'm Being Regressed to the Mean is the clearest explanation of regression to the mean that I've seen so far.

Comment author: Snowyowl 02 September 2010 01:24:54PM *  6 points [-]

Wow. I thought I understood regression to the mean already, but the "correlation between X and Y-X" is so much simpler and clearer than any explanation I could give.

Comment author: Vladimir_M 02 September 2010 04:00:14AM *  2 points [-]

When I tried making sense of this topic in the context of the controversies over IQ heritability, the best reference I found was this old paper:

Brian Mackenzie, Fallacious use of regression effects in the I.Q. controversy, Australian Psychologist 15(3):369-384, 1980

Unfortunately, the paper failed to achieve any significant impact, probably because it was published in a low-key journal long before Google, and it's now languishing in complete obscurity. I considered contacting the author to ask if it could be put for open access online -- it would be definitely worth it -- but I was unable to find any contact information; it seems like he retired long ago.

There is also another paper with a pretty good exposition of this problem, which seems to be a minor classic, and is still cited occasionally:

Lita Furby, Interpreting regression toward the mean in developmental research, Developmental Psychology, 8(2):172-179, 1973