xamdam comments on Less Wrong: Open Thread, September 2010 - Less Wrong

3 Post author: matt 01 September 2010 01:40AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (610)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: xamdam 01 September 2010 08:55:10PM 3 points [-]

I believe hypertext reading is deeper, and that this is obvious, almost true by definition. Non-hypertext reading is exactly 1 layer deep. Hypertext lets the reader go deeper. Literally. You can zoom in on any topic.

It has deeper structure, but that is not necessarily user-friendly. A great textbook will have different levels of explanation, an author-designed depth-diving experience. Depending on author, material, you and the local wikipedia quality that might be a better or worse learning experience.

Hypertext reading lets you find your own connections, and lets you find background knowledge that would otherwise simply be edited out of a book.

Yep, definitely a benefit, but not without a trade-off. Often a good author will set you up with connections better than you can.

Comment author: PhilGoetz 20 September 2010 04:14:35PM 0 points [-]

Often a good author will set you up with connections better than you can.

But not better than a good hypertext author can.

Comment author: xamdam 20 September 2010 06:31:37PM 0 points [-]

If the hypertext is intentionally written as a book, which is generally not the case.