Andy_McKenzie comments on Soulless morality - Less Wrong

20 Post author: PhilGoetz 14 March 2009 09:48PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (36)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: Andy_McKenzie 14 March 2009 11:35:45PM 5 points [-]

Society tells you to work to make yourself more valuable. Then it tells you that when you reason morally, you must assume that all lives are equally valuable.

Nitpicking: I don't think this is a good way of framing the issue. "Society" doesn't tell you to do anything. There are societal structures in place that reward certain actions, but you are not told to do anything one way or another. I only mention this because you are not the first to do so.

As far as your ethics are concerned, you are assuming that a rationalist will be able to deduce the best possible action at the outset of his life, instead of experimenting with various strategies and updating your beliefs. In a probabilistic environment, reward matching is the best strategy.