Snowyowl comments on Frugality and working from finite data - Less Wrong

27 Post author: Snowyowl 03 September 2010 09:37AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (46)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Jayson_Virissimo 03 September 2010 07:12:45PM 4 points [-]

The scientific method is wonderfully simple, intuitive, and above all effective. Based on the available evidence, you formulate several hypotheses and assign prior probabilities to each one. Then, you devise an experiment which will produce new evidence to distinguish between the hypotheses. Finally, you perform the experiment, and adjust your probabilities accordingly.

Either there is more than one "scientific method", it isn't really a method, or science doesn't actually follow the scientific method (and therefore, cannot be justified by that method).

Comment author: Snowyowl 03 September 2010 09:07:22PM *  2 points [-]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_method

I think your third idea is right: science cannot be used to justify its own fundamental principles. For one thing, that argument would be very circular.