Larks comments on Frugality and working from finite data - Less Wrong

27 Post author: Snowyowl 03 September 2010 09:37AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (46)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: DanielLC 05 September 2010 05:27:14PM 2 points [-]

How about this: it doesn't matter.

If we want to build a device that only works if a certain theory is true, we can use it to test the theory. If not, you can do what you want either way, so what does it matter?

There's still similar useful problems. For instance: you can keep getting new data on economics, but there's no way anyone's going to let you do an experiment. In addition, the data you're getting is very bad if you're trying to eliminate bias. It can't be solved in that way, though.

Comment author: Larks 09 September 2010 08:36:03PM 0 points [-]

Yes; if your theories don't differ in their constraints on expectation, you both can't test the difference and the difference doesn't matter for the future.

The problem is when your theories diverge in the future predictions such that you would take radically different courses of action, depending on which was true.