Clippy is an agent defined by a certain inhuman ethics. Therefore, your test distinguishes ethical questions from non-ethical questions.

There are meaningless non-ethical questions: "What's a froob?" Human: "I don't know." Clippy: "I don't know."

There are only non-meaningless ethical questions with some kind of assumed axiom that allows us to cross the fact-value distinction, such as Eliezer's meta-ethics or "one should always act so as to maximize paperclips."

In general: Positivism teaches us to ignore many things we should not ignore. Rationalism, however, teaches us to ignore some things, but it does not teach us to ignore ethical questions.

Experiment: ask Clippy a question about decision theory.

Hey Clippy. What decision theory do you use to determine how your actions produce paperclips?