jimrandomh comments on A "Failure to Evaluate Return-on-Time" Fallacy - Less Wrong

47 Post author: lionhearted 07 September 2010 07:01PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (109)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: ChristianKl 08 September 2010 08:37:03AM 2 points [-]

Given to choice to start a running habit, which would you choose? a) Buying new running shoes b) Starting to run with your precious shoes

Psychological research suggests that b) has a higher chance of producing a lasting habit. Your strategy would however suggest that a) can be billed as high value wile b) doesn't.

It's no good idea to try to feel satisfaction for something else then following through on the habit. It reduces the satisfaction you can expect by actually following through because you already felt some satisfaction for the goal. Therefore you are less likely to follow through.

There also a related TED talk: http://www.ted.com/talks/derek_sivers_keep_your_goals_to_yourself.html

Comment author: jimrandomh 08 September 2010 12:09:48PM 3 points [-]

I would count (b) only the first time, when it's precedent-setting. I wouldn't count (a) at all, unless my current shoes were in such poor condition that they were a genuine obstacle to running; the connection between buying running shoes and running is quite tenuous, despite the name and the marketing.