AnnaSalamon comments on Humans are not automatically strategic - Less Wrong

153 Post author: AnnaSalamon 08 September 2010 07:02AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (266)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: AnnaSalamon 08 September 2010 07:14:07PM *  13 points [-]

I might well be. Given the value of empiricism-type virtues, anyone want to go test it (by creating an operationalized notion of what it is to understand the heuristics, and then finding randomly choosing several people independently from e.g. your local grocery store and testing it on them), and let us know the results?

Jasen Murray and Marcello and I tried this the other day concerning what portion of native English speaking American adults know what a "sphere" is ("a ball" or "orange-shaped" count; "a circle" doesn't), and found that of the five we sampled, three knew and two didn't.

Comment author: Kaj_Sotala 08 September 2010 09:15:49PM 1 point [-]

(damnit, I can't remember who)

My memory suggests either Jasen or Louie.

Comment author: AnnaSalamon 08 September 2010 09:54:26PM 2 points [-]

Thanks, Kaj.