orthonormal comments on Humans are not automatically strategic - Less Wrong

153 Post author: AnnaSalamon 08 September 2010 07:02AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (266)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: psyklic 08 September 2010 09:04:32PM 4 points [-]

I disagree - I think that people usually do know how they could be more productive. This argument is really about people who TALK versus people who DO - the talkers know that optimally they should be "do"ing. But, being a sheep (talker) is BORING, and being a fox (do-er) is LONELY.

In the author's example, the comedian knows that watching re-runs is the easy way out. He'll be bored, but he'll learn a little bit and he can tell his friends he's working.

He also knows that, ideally, he'd be working comedy all the time instead. But he's already working another job, he's tired at night, and if he REALLY plunged into comedy he'd lose his free time too. He'd be lonely and on his own.

This isn't an issue of the comedian not having "strategic" capabilities. It's an issue of him not being a risk-taker, not being sufficiently motivated, and in many ways of him just being tired out!

Comment author: orthonormal 09 September 2010 10:38:29PM 0 points [-]

Hi psyklic, and welcome to Less Wrong! Be sure and introduce yourself in the welcome thread.