= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
Matt_Simpson comments on Intellectual Hipsters and Meta-Contrarianism - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (323)
So, where would "Believe because of generalised Pascal's Wager" be on your hierarchy? ;)
I'm not sure what the "generalized" is doing, but normal pascal's wager would probably be right before or right after the design argument.