wedrifid comments on Intellectual Hipsters and Meta-Contrarianism - Less Wrong

147 Post author: Yvain 13 September 2010 09:36PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (323)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: timtyler 01 October 2010 08:00:40PM *  0 points [-]

Anyone trying to accomplish anything is going to try to get dollars, attention, and manpower. I'm confused as to how this is relevant to the merit of SIAI's purpose.

To recap, the SIAI is funded by donations from those who think that they will help prevent the end of the world at the hands of intelligent machines. For this pitch to work, the world must be at risk - in order for them to be able to save it. The SIAI face some resistance over this point, and these days, much of their output is oriented towards convincing others that these may be the end days. Also there will be a selection bias, with those most convinced of a high p(DOOM) most likely to be involved. Like I said, not necessarily the type of organisation one would want to approach if seeking the facts of the matter.

You pretend to fail to see connections between the SIAI and an END OF THE WORLD cult - but it isn't a terribly convincing act.

For the connections, see here. For protesting too much, see You're calling who a cult leader?

Comment deleted 02 October 2010 04:25:03AM [-]
Comment author: timtyler 02 October 2010 12:17:54PM *  0 points [-]

I didn't say anyone was "racing to be first to establish their non-cult-victim status" - but it is certainly a curious image! [deleted parent comment was a dupe].

Comment author: wedrifid 02 October 2010 01:25:43PM 0 points [-]

Oops, connection troubles then missed.