simplicio comments on The Affect Heuristic, Sentiment, and Art - Less Wrong

66 [deleted] 13 September 2010 11:05PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (56)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Relsqui 14 September 2010 05:29:59AM 24 points [-]

I'm a new reader, and I thought you might like to know that this is the post that made me feel like it might be okay to get involved in the LW community. My initial instinct when I started looking around here was trepidation--it reminded me of some people I know who are very smart, intellectual, and rational, who love to debate and analyze ... and to argue with people who might not want to, and who are hopeless at understanding people less rational than themselves, don't acknowledge their own emotions, and don't see how irrational it is to think and behave that way. Before joining the conversation, I needed to hear that this place was not for those people--not an intellectual wankfest but something actually practical, even when it comes to the less reasoned parts of ourselves. So, thanks for that.

Now to salvage the relevance of this comment.

As a practical suggestion for ourselves and each other, it might be interesting to experiment with non-argumentative ways of conveying a point of view: tell an illustrative story, express your idea in the form of an epigram, or even quote a poem or a piece of music or a photograph.

I would have worded this more strongly, myself. In my experience, people who are themselves inclined towards reasoned debate, even civilly, drastically overestimate how much other people are also inclined towards debate and argument. They are of course generalizing from one example, but in this particular case they're also doing intense harm to their social relationships and to the point they're trying to communicate. In their minds, they're engaging in a way which displays and encourages intelligent thought, but to people who dislike a heavily oppositional mode of conversation, they come off as belligerent prats.

The point here is that those who enjoy an adversarial style of heated conversation might find their communication more effective and more readily listened to by a dissimilar audience if they choose to present their ideas in a way that seems to them to be more indirect--perhaps not quite to the level of writing a sonnet about it, but by speaking in general terms, avoiding language which invokes an accusatory tone whether or not personal accusation is intended, and so on. In short, intellectuals that no one will listen to have a lot to learn from poorly-educated but widely-admired poets.

Also, at the risk of exposing my unintellectual taste, my "O Isis Und Osiris" is the bassline of Jet's "Are You Gonna Be My Girl." I briefly worked in QA at EA (many of you know the reputation of that job and also that company, and those who don't can infer it from the tone of this parenthesis). I was testing the original Rock Band, and when I was having a rough morning and didn't want to be there, I'd play through that bassline a couple of times and I'd be doing all right.

Comment author: simplicio 14 September 2010 05:45:16AM *  3 points [-]

Welcome!

Although it sounds like you've very much landed on your feet here, may I point out the LW FAQ?

...not an intellectual wankfest but something actually practical, even when it comes to the less reasoned parts of ourselves. So, thanks for that.

Oceans of ink have been spilt on this topic here. We're trying very hard to be practical, but a lot of us also really enjoy more airy topics for their own sake.

...people who are themselves inclined towards reasoned debate, even civilly, drastically overestimate how much other people are also inclined towards debate and argument... [and might be] more readily listened to by a dissimilar audience if they choose to present their ideas in a way that seems to them to be more indirect...

Yes. This is why I love projects like HP:MoR. Of course it IS very didactic, but still manages to convey a lot of important ideas without bogging down in syllogisms or raising people's hackles.

Also, at the risk of exposing my unintellectual taste, my "O Isis Und Osiris" is the bassline of Jet's "Are You Gonna Be My Girl."

Although I mentioned Beethoven as mine in another comment, the same goes for about ten folk songs. :)

Comment author: Relsqui 14 September 2010 06:05:32AM 2 points [-]

Welcome!

Thanks! Yeah, I've done a little bit of exploratory looking around, but not so much as to have found that yet; I'll take a look. (I did, however, find the welcome thread, and not post in it. Yet. cough)

We're trying very hard to be practical, but a lot of us also really enjoy more airy topics for their own sake.

Good to know. I may not appreciate every thread, but I needn't flee from the whole community. That is acceptable. ;)

HP:MoR

Okay, I do at least try to Google unknown terms, but I'm guessing you were not referring to a printer.

However, the bit you quoted is also the reason that I like Nonviolent Communication, which I forgot to mention at the time. It's essentially a codified template for how to talk about emotions and needs, and find practical solutions, in a conflict situation, without making the conflict worse. As someone who is fairly balanced between the logical and emotional sides of her brain, I find it handy, but it seems like for someone who was very logic-dominant it would be invaluable. Of course, it's written in a very emotional, touchy-feely style (typical psyche again), which makes it very unappealing to the people who (incoming opinion) need it most. This inspired me to start brainstorming a book designed for more logically-minded and less emotionally-conscious people on how to communicate with those who are the other way around. I may at some point try to pick the brains of folks here about that.

the same goes for about ten folk songs

That too. I'm very early in the process of learning the guitar, and spent much of this afternoon belting out Jim Croce's Workin' at the Car Wash Blues. It went a long way towards getting me out of a frustrated "oh-god-this-is-hard-and-there-is-so-much-more-to-learn" funk.

Comment author: simplicio 14 September 2010 06:17:30AM 1 point [-]

Sorry! HP:MoR = Harry Potter and the Methods of Rationality, a fanfic by Eliezer Yudkowsky.

This inspired me to start brainstorming a book designed for more logically-minded and less emotionally-conscious people on how to communicate with those who are the other way around. I may at some point try to pick the brains of folks here about that.

I look forward to that! You may want to know that a lot of those communication methodology issues have been talked about (though certainly not exhaustively) in the "Craft and Community" sequence.

It went a long way towards getting me out of a frustrated "oh-god-this-is-hard-and-there-is-so-much-more-to-learn" funk.

Well done! I'm still in that funk with my mando, alas.

Comment author: datadataeverywhere 15 September 2010 02:54:19PM 3 points [-]

I think this is an area where linking to HP:MoR with the text of the link being the term looked for helps Google properly categorize it. Of course, Google mostly ignores forum threads, so the link above probably won't help much.

Comment author: Relsqui 14 September 2010 08:35:16AM 3 points [-]

Sorry!

No worries. I've had fair warning about the frequency of specialized communication in here; I was mostly just amused by that particular one's unsearchability (as opposed to, say, "akrasia," which I just asked Wikipedia about the first time I encountered it).

in the "Craft and Community" sequence

Thanks; I'm eyeing the sequence list in another tab but hadn't gotten that far yet. I'm a huge communication and language nerd (albeit one wholly without technical qualifications), so that and the word definition stuff jump out at me, aside from the core. However, the fact that it's nearly 1:30am also jumps out at me. (Speaking of akrasia.) (I did just go through the gentle intro to Bayesian Theory, although after getting the initial problem correct, I admit I skimmed some of the explanation. I don't have a good intuition for what the right answers are, but I have a good intuition for when not to trust my intuition about what they are, and then I can work the math out at my leisure.)

I'm still in that funk with my mando

Good luck! Two things it has helped me to remember when working on the guitar come from my mental file of good-advice-I-heard-somewhere, both paraphrased:

1) "Getting better at things is a skill which, like any other skill, improves with practice." (I got this from a documentary whose name I don't recall, about a fellow trying for the world record in Missile Command. It encourages me because my last big learning project went well, so maybe I'm getting better at getting better at things!)

2) "You're going to lose your first hundred games; may as well get them over with." (From a Go player. Generalizable to: "When you're new to something, you're going to suck at it. Do it loud, do it proud, and most importantly do it often, and soon the necessary period of sucking at it will be over.")