lavalamp comments on On Juvenile Fiction - Less Wrong

24 Post author: MBlume 17 March 2009 08:53AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (113)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: lavalamp 25 November 2011 08:43:01PM 2 points [-]

Not sure, maybe something to do with:

but "fairly ordinary liberalism" is a pretty good stepping stone to rationality

...which was true given my background but quite possibly not for those with a less fundamentalist upbringing.

Comment author: [deleted] 25 November 2011 09:01:20PM 0 points [-]

Hmm, thank you. I edited it to "fairly ordinary [Enlightenment/old] liberalism" to show that we aren't talking about modern "liberal" views (pro-choice, lgbt rights, etc), but even that is probably not right...

Honestly, I did not really know what was meant by "Enlightenment liberalism", but since it was used as a term to talk about the themes I mentioned, specifically:

The winners make history, power of the media to control and tame masses, bystander effect, even the "good side" can be bad, think for yourself, authority isn't always right.

I assumed that that was what Enlightenment liberalism was. But from wikipedia-ing, it seems like the closest thing is Classical Liberalism, which is about the rights and freedoms of the governed. So honestly, I don't think I really understand this term as it is being used in the conversation, and have probably used it incorrectly.

I apologize, and thanks for the info.