MartinB comments on The conscious tape - Less Wrong

11 Post author: PhilGoetz 16 September 2010 07:55PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (113)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: MartinB 16 September 2010 11:45:40PM 1 point [-]

Option 4: there is no such thing as consciousness. Its all just an elaborate hoax our minds play on us. In reality we are 'just' state machines with complicated caches that give the appearance of a conscious mind acting. The illusion is good enough to fool us all, and works well enough for real life.

The more i learn off neuro science the more I get the impression that there is no real 'person' hidden in the body, just a shell, that runs lots of software over data storage, and seems to act somewhat consistent. So the closer you look, the less consciousness is left to see.

Please note that I still have trouble understanding how qualia work.

Comment author: NancyLebovitz 20 September 2010 04:35:47PM 10 points [-]

My problem with that sort of explanation is that I don't see how there can be illusion without a consciousness present to be mistaken.

Comment author: atucker 22 September 2010 03:56:13AM *  1 point [-]

Is an illusion something other than a system failing to correctly represent its otherwise accurate sensory input?

Particularly if it happens in a specific and reproducible way, so that even though the information it gathers is accurate, said information is internally represented as being something different and inaccurate.

Because I can write programs that have bugs that are pretty much that.

Comment author: NancyLebovitz 22 September 2010 04:10:49PM 0 points [-]

I'm not sure, but that's an interesting and possibly valid point.

Comment author: Tiiba 17 September 2010 02:57:14PM *  6 points [-]

Something is making us talk about consciousness. Until we come up with a definition, we really have no business saying that this very real something is a fake version of some undefined ball of vagueness. It's like saying that trees are just big wooden things pretending to be snumbas. It's a lot better to just find out what makes us talk about consciousness and say, "Let's call it consciousness!"

Comment author: MartinB 17 September 2010 03:42:09PM 1 point [-]

Well yes. A good definition matters.

Option 2 makes the least sense to me. It should be possible to have consciousness with any kind of computational device.