neq1 comments on Bayes' rule =/= Bayesian inference - Less Wrong

37 Post author: neq1 16 September 2010 06:34AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (70)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: neq1 16 September 2010 01:33:14PM 1 point [-]

only if you keep specifying hyper-priors, which there is no reason to do

Comment author: Oscar_Cunningham 16 September 2010 02:50:26PM 0 points [-]

Exactly. There's no point in the first meta-prior either.