Cyan comments on Bayes' rule =/= Bayesian inference - Less Wrong
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (70)
Joseph Felsenstein is a pioneer in the use of maximum likelihood methods in evolutionary biology. In his book, "Inferring Phylogenies", he has a chapter on Bayesian methods, and a section in that chapter on controversies over Bayesian inference. He discusses a toy example of a space probe to Mars which looks for little green men and doesn't find them. He wonders whether a scientist whose prior for little green men involved odds of 1/4, and who, based on the evidence of the space probe, now assigns odds of 1/12, should publish those revised odds. He writes:
Felsenstein apparently defines himself as a "likelihoodist" rather than a "frequentist" or "Bayesian".
"Likelihoodist" is so clunky and dull. I prefer "likelihoodlum" -- it's just as clunky, but at least it's somewhat inflammatory.