SarahC comments on Open Thread, September, 2010-- part 2 - Less Wrong

3 Post author: NancyLebovitz 17 September 2010 01:44AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (858)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Will_Newsome 24 September 2010 05:36:57PM *  15 points [-]

OkCupid thread, anyone?

I was thinking that those of us that aren't shy could share our OkCupid profiles for critique from people who know better. (Not that we have to accept the critiques as valid, but this is an area where it'd be good to have others' opinions anyway.)

If anyone wants to get the ball rolling, post a link to your profile and hopefully someone will offer a suggestion (or a compliment).

Also, I bet cross-sexual-preference critique would be best: which for most of us means gals critiquing guys and guys critiquing gals. But I realize the LW gender skew limits that.

Comment author: [deleted] 24 September 2010 06:50:49PM 5 points [-]
Comment author: Relsqui 25 September 2010 12:58:35AM 3 points [-]

I moused over your photo thumbnails to see what whpearson was talking about and thought, "Man, who does that smile remind me of? Oh, it's Kaylee! That's a Kaylee smile."

And then I read the actual first line of your profile and cracked up.

Comment author: jacob_cannell 25 September 2010 04:11:05AM 2 points [-]

Unsolicited advice: Your third pic with the red dress is the best - but only 3? You could use a few more.

Aspartame is evil!

Ahh you and alicorn make me feel old. I would never have guessed so many people where were under 25.

Comment author: whpearson 24 September 2010 08:31:15PM 2 points [-]

I prefer the third picture to the first, although that may just be the clothing colours and fewer jpeg artifacts. You might want to crop the third to remove the plastic cups and extraneous people.

Other than that, I think you have a good mix of factual info to quirkiness in your profile.

You might think about re-ordering your categories of interests in terms of what is most important to you. If people are scanning then they might switch off after reading something that isn't so important (movies?) before reading something that is.

Comment author: thomblake 24 September 2010 06:56:25PM 2 points [-]

I didn't realize there were Lwers in the New Haven area; I should've expected that to change once school started up again. Tom McCabe is nearby too, I reckon. There should be a meetup, but I'm not allowed to organize those anymore.

Comment author: Kevin 25 September 2010 10:23:39AM 8 points [-]

By the power vested in me by the cult of CEV, I hereby grant you permission to organize LW meetups.

Comment author: Will_Newsome 25 September 2010 10:14:24AM 1 point [-]

Relative LW newcomer (I think) Will_Sawin should be where Tom McCabe is, I think, if Tom is at Yale and Yale is near New Haven.

Comment author: Alicorn 24 September 2010 06:59:13PM 1 point [-]

Why aren't you allowed?

Comment author: thomblake 24 September 2010 07:00:38PM 1 point [-]

I totally botched the one at the H+ summit that I had taken responsibility for, so I declared that I am no longer allowed to organize those.

Comment author: Yvain 24 September 2010 08:38:02PM *  6 points [-]

Don't feel bad. You can't possibly be worse than me. I accidentally arranged a London meet-up with two days notice on Easter in a bookstore that was closed at the time (and Tomas, Richard, and Ciphergoth showed up anyway, to their great credit).

Comment author: wedrifid 25 September 2010 09:35:47AM 1 point [-]

Meanwhile everyone else was busy at church celebrating the rebirth of Christ?

At least it isn't your religiously significant tradition you clashed with. :)

Comment author: RichardKennaway 27 September 2010 06:21:57PM 0 points [-]

The Starbucks along the road was open, so we celebrated the global capitalists and their rascally way of making money by selling people what they want to buy.

Comment author: jacob_cannell 25 September 2010 04:06:27AM 0 points [-]

Wait, so how was that bad?

Comment author: Interpolate 25 September 2010 06:26:52PM 1 point [-]

I would make your third picture your display picture.

I don't have many specific names/titles listed in the favourites section, but I found that I received more messages when I did.

Comment author: wedrifid 25 September 2010 09:32:25AM 1 point [-]

Things you couldn't do without: Aspartame. Nice. :)

I seem to recall someone laying into superstition surrounding aspartame risks here a while back. Including rather adamant skepticism about a friend's belief that it was the cause of her difficulties. Was that you or do we have another fan of artificial sweetener? :)

Comment author: komponisto 26 September 2010 12:30:44AM 3 points [-]

You were thinking of LauraABJ.

Comment author: wedrifid 26 September 2010 03:54:45AM 0 points [-]

Ahh, yes, that's the one.

Comment author: [deleted] 25 September 2010 12:42:07PM 2 points [-]

No, I'm a different person.

I've never researched the health risks specifically, but I'm generally skeptical of the mindset that "we're not healthy because of all the chemicals we put in our bodies!" I'm also in favor of taking small risks that greatly increase one's quality of life. I hadn't thought about it much, but I guess aspartame says a lot about me.

Comment author: Kevin 25 September 2010 05:45:49AM 1 point [-]

Reiterating advice I gave someone else -- you would look better with less blurry photos.

Comment author: komponisto 24 September 2010 10:07:48PM *  1 point [-]

Out of curiosity, why do you consider Schubert lieder to be controversial?

Comment author: [deleted] 25 September 2010 05:33:54AM 0 points [-]

People either love 'em or hate 'em. I have known folks who absolutely can't get through one song.

Comment author: komponisto 26 September 2010 12:33:19AM 0 points [-]

Interesting. Living as I do in a Second-Viennese-School-and-beyond sort of world, I guess I'm just not used to thinking of Schubert as a "controversial" composer.

Comment author: Vladimir_M 25 September 2010 06:27:12AM 0 points [-]

The third picture looks like you're standing at attention. I'd recommend a more relaxed-looking pose!

Comment author: [deleted] 25 September 2010 06:32:07AM 1 point [-]

Oh god. I have heard several picture criticisms here and from people I know personally. The fact is that I really don't photograph well. It's hard enough to find pictures where I have a nice expression and don't look fat. Good posture and good camera quality -- not gonna happen.

Comment author: whpearson 25 September 2010 09:09:25AM 3 points [-]

I'd message you on the strength of those pictures/profile (assuming I was in the right location/age group).

So I wouldn't get too down-hearted about people criticising them. This is a thread to suggest improvements, so we are looking for what could be improved.

Comment author: Vladimir_M 25 September 2010 06:24:35PM 0 points [-]

The picture is funny in a cute way. It looks like you had a severe case of that semi-conscious reflex to assume a "proper" position when someone points a camera at you, so you ended up striking a pose straight from the drill manual. :-) Getting rid of that misleading instinct is a good first step towards making oneself more photogenic.

In any case, look at it as a cost-benefit question. How much do you care about this particular mode of public self-presentation, and how much effort for procuring good photos does this justify? (The easiest way to get some good photos is to hang around those irritating people who relentlessly snap their digital cameras next time you go to a party, and then just ask them to email you the pictures and make a selection out of the huge pile. The best way is to ask someone who has some basic photography skills to snap a few pictures of you.)

Comment author: Relsqui 26 September 2010 05:49:19AM 3 points [-]

Tacking on some more photo advice:

When I was taking my senior formals for my high school yearbook, the photographer kept egging me on to smile more. It got really annoying. I WAS smiling! Finally, just to make him knock it off, I plastered on a giant stupid really fake grin. He said "perfect!" and shot it. They came out fantastic.

Comment author: Alicorn 24 September 2010 06:51:52PM 0 points [-]

Hey, you live near me! Neat!

Comment author: [deleted] 24 September 2010 06:55:09PM 0 points [-]

I didn't know that! Let's meet up some time.

Comment author: Alicorn 26 September 2010 04:42:27PM 0 points [-]

I PMed you my contact info so we can set this up offsite; did you get it?

Comment author: [deleted] 26 September 2010 04:51:55PM 0 points [-]

yep.