Luke_Grecki comments on (Virtual) Employment Open Thread - Less Wrong

35 Post author: Will_Newsome 23 September 2010 04:25AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (276)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: [deleted] 23 September 2010 04:30:05PM 4 points [-]

This sounds sooooo awesomely amazing.

But I think the cultishness factor means it would be damaging to the rationality and Singularity memes, even if we never overtly discussed the Singularity.

A study of social dynamics might suggest ways to get around this. Lets at least keep it in the back of our minds.

Comment author: Will_Newsome 24 September 2010 04:50:06AM *  3 points [-]

Social dynamics would probably be less of a worry than getting funding. Also, internet access. Satellite internet sounds kinda sucky. This looks a tad unbelievable. Or is the internet overrated anyway? I wonder how difficult farming really is. There are probably more efficient and lazier ways to get food. (Which isn't necessarily good.)

One possibly cool thing about it would be a community blog. I bet such a blog could get really popular, and then Hacker News and Silicon Valley people might show up, which could lead to cool things happening.

Added: DUDE. You can fly around in an airplane without a license or anything. We need a fleet of these things, and people could pay to get training or use them. Instant profit.

Comment author: wedrifid 24 September 2010 05:06:10AM 2 points [-]

Social dynamics would probably be less of a worry than getting funding.

That wouldn't be my expectation. Money is easy. Social dynamics are hard.

Comment author: mattnewport 24 September 2010 06:22:48AM 0 points [-]

(It looks like there's no way to get that link to work...

This is one of the useful side-effects of learning programming.

Comment author: Nick_Tarleton 24 September 2010 06:21:03AM 0 points [-]

(It looks like there's no way to get that link to work...)

Use a backslash before the internal paren.

Comment author: Will_Newsome 24 September 2010 06:30:22AM 0 points [-]

Not enough information.

Comment author: wedrifid 24 September 2010 06:33:01AM *  2 points [-]
[Link](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ultralight_aircraft_(United_States\))

Link

I added a \ to the code you were using to create the link. I added it between the 's' and the first ')'. This escapes the ')' so that it is just considered a character rather than the message to markdown that the address has finished. Then there is another ')' which does not have the \ escape character.

Comment author: Will_Newsome 24 September 2010 06:40:11AM 2 points [-]

Reason I hate coding number 7: I think I tried every possible permutation except that one, and that happens every time. Okay, not really, I just hate feeling dumb.

Comment author: wedrifid 24 September 2010 06:56:06AM *  2 points [-]

Feeling dumb does suck. It may have sucked even more if we just told you to RTFM instead of explaining. In fact, not liking looking stupid is probably one of the reasons I have the manual bookmarked. ;)

Comment author: Will_Newsome 24 September 2010 06:58:15AM *  1 point [-]

Hm, I bet this recurring problem generalizes. What heuristics should I have used to find the manual? I would have guessed 'reddit commenting markdown'.

Comment author: wedrifid 24 September 2010 07:03:04AM 1 point [-]

I just googled markdown syntax. If I didn't know that LW used markdown I would have googled "reddit syntax". If I didn't know LW was reddit-like I would have googled "lesswrong syntax". (All of those worked by the way. Although would have required reading a page then possibly following link or doing another search based on the new information.)

Comment author: Will_Newsome 24 September 2010 07:09:50AM 1 point [-]

Nothing magic then. Thanks.

Comment author: Nick_Tarleton 24 September 2010 06:33:35AM *  0 points [-]
[text]((link\))

(I implicitly assumed that you could see the markup. D'oh.)