Dustin comments on Anti-akrasia remote monitoring experiment - Less Wrong

45 Post author: cousin_it 27 September 2010 11:34PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (114)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: gwern 28 September 2010 07:56:13PM 0 points [-]

Process names should be safe to share, since all users on a system can see them and a system is supposed to be secure for a user even with other malicious users. No sane software puts keys or passwords into stdargs where it can be seen through a ps or something.

DNS lookups should also be secure in a sense since no one in their right mind would write server software where the port/address is the key, but privacy might also be a problem. (Then again, if you are browsing FreePorn.com while doing this, maybe you deserve any consequences.)

Comment author: Dustin 28 September 2010 08:00:56PM 1 point [-]

FYI, I think on Windows you can only see processes for your user unless your user is an Admin.

Windows Vista/7 makes not running as Admin more common.

Comment author: gwern 28 September 2010 10:27:55PM *  0 points [-]

Yes, well, Windows doesn't have a very good history when it comes to supporting multiple users - not nearly as good as Unix systems, anyway. So draconian measures are to be expected.