Will_Newsome comments on The Irrationality Game - Less Wrong

38 Post author: Will_Newsome 03 October 2010 02:43AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (910)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Will_Newsome 03 October 2010 06:11:06AM *  10 points [-]

I am shocked that more people believe in a 95% chance of advanced flying saucers than a 99.5% change of not being in 'basement reality'. Really?! I still think all of you upvoters are irrational! Irrational I say!

Comment author: LucasSloan 03 October 2010 08:03:57AM 0 points [-]

I certainly agree with you now, but it wasn't entirely certain what you meant by your statement. A qualifier might help.

Comment author: Will_Newsome 03 October 2010 08:07:50AM 0 points [-]

Most won't see the need for precision, but you're right, I should add a qualifier for those who'd (justifiably) like it.

Comment author: Perplexed 04 October 2010 12:31:56AM 2 points [-]

Help! There is someone reasoning in terms of decision theoretic significantness ruining my fun by telling me that my disagreement with you is meaningless.

Comment author: Will_Newsome 04 October 2010 01:13:57AM 3 points [-]

Ahhh! Ahhhhh! I am extremely reluctant to go into long explanations here. Have you read the TDT manual though? I think it's up at the singinst.org website now, finally. It might dissolve confusions of interpretation, but no promises. Sorry, it's just a really tricky and confusing topic with lots of different intuitions to take into account and I really couldn't do it justice in a few paragraphs here. :(